Reviewer Guidelines

 

Reviewer Guidelines

REVIEWER GUIDELINES
The following reviewer responsibilities are based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines:

COPE Core Practices ↗

What Do Reviewers Do?

Reviewers evaluate articles submitted to a journal and advise the editors on whether the article is suitable for publication. This combines a comprehensive technical review of the quality, integrity, and accuracy of the submitted research with a broader perspective on the potential interest the results may hold for the journal's readership, depending on the journal's publication criteria.

Good reviewers work collaboratively with authors to improve their work. They provide feedback on the paper, suggest improvements, and make recommendations to the editor regarding acceptance, rejection, or requests for revision. The final decision always rests with the editor, but reviewers play a crucial role in determining the outcome.

The peer review process is time-consuming but highly rewarding for both reviewers and the community. Reviewers:

  • Uphold the rigorous standards of the scientific process by participating in the peer review system.
  • Maintain the integrity of the scientific record by identifying invalid research and help preserve the quality of academic literature.
  • Fulfill a sense of responsibility to the community and their own field of research.
  • Build relationships with reputable peers and participate in a global network within their field.
  • Establish a reputation with editors and their affiliated journals, potentially leading to editorial roles.
  • Help prevent ethical violations by identifying potential plagiarism, research misconduct, and other issues through their familiarity with the field.
  • Reciprocate professional courtesy, as the roles of author and reviewer are often interchangeable—as reviewers, researchers grant the same level of attention they expect as authors.

Volunteering to Review

Typically, reviewers are invited by journal editors to conduct a review. Editors usually select experts in the same field as the paper. However, if you believe you are a suitable reviewer for a particular journal, you may contact the journal office directly. Please note that you should provide your reviewer profile first.

Alternatively, visit the journal's homepage, click on "Editorial Team," and contact the relevant editors via email to offer your reviewing services. Please note that the selection of a reviewer for a paper is entirely at the discretion of the editors; ifspress is not involved in this decision.


Before You Begin

Before accepting or declining an invitation to review, please consider the following questions:

  • Expertise: Does this article align with your area of expertise?
  • Potential Conflicts: Do you have a conflict of interest with the authors, their institutions, or the research mentioned in the paper?
  • Time Commitment: Do you have sufficient time to complete a thorough and high-quality review within the deadline specified by the journal?